Can we freely photograph people on the street?

Can we freely photograph people on the street? (Cancun Wedding Photographer)

Attached is an article published by permission of Darqroom, alleging Mag Darqroom that should interest you concerning image rights.

But to give credit where it is necessary to present this company that offers products tailored to demanding photographers!(Riviera Maya Wedding Photographer) 

The site Darqroom "and photos become works of art" -> the site Darqroom

The Darqroom Magazine , a gold mine -> http://www.msedacca.com

DarQroom, a showcase for your images

Your professional photographer site, unlimited picture storage in digital photo art. From virtual to reality, under one roof, top quality.

Can we freely photograph people on the street?(Workshops para fotografos de bodas)

After seeing that one could not necessarily freely photograph public buildings, what about people? Should permission to capture, secure and above all publish their image?

When the person is not recognizable or identifiable, permission is not necessary a priori. However, otherwise, it will almost always permission (at least in France and Europe) to broadcast his picture to the public: as part of an exhibition, for use on the Internet, for use commercial, .(Best photographer in mexico)publication in a magazine etc: any act of exposing the picture to the public. Why, how, under what circumstances can we do without it? Well here:

→ Why?

Any person, known or not known, right to respect for his private life: This right is provided for in Article 9 of our Civil Code as follows: "Everyone has the right to respect for private life", but also at European level by Article 8 of the European Convention on human rights (ECHR), in a longer barely formula "Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence" .(Playa del carmen wedding venues)

The right of all persons on its image, is part of the right to respect for private life: this is what the judges decided: the image of a person is an attribute of personality, and as such is protected under the privacy Act. Therefore, the judges consider that any person, known or unknown, has in principle the right to oppose the capture and dissemination of his image without his permission, under penalty of harm and that the photographer or those responsible for the broadcast may be sentenced to repair notably in him paying damages next